
Meanwhile, Gordon Brown rearranges some deckchairs...

With General Motors (who own Vauxhall and Opel), Ford, Chrysler, Jaguar/Land Rover (owned by the Chinese company, Tata) all coming cap in hand to our governments, do they deserve to be given our money? In a word, no.
I am tired of this talk of bailouts. These companies have been unprofitable for years. They have had plenty of time to change their ways. The banks have given them so much rope, that they are hanging themselves, now that a recession is upon us. These companies have essentially been on life support for all of this time. Meanwhile, their directors and board members swaned about, spending money they didn't have. The big three US car company CEOs even arrived in private jets for their bailout meeting! What planet are these people on?
Ford, in its belated wisdom, sold off Jaguar and Land Rover. With Jaguar, the brand is still held in high regard and their two new models have been well received. However, luxury marques on brand new cars are not what people want during a recession, especially one triggered by a tightening of credit. Ford were probably wise to sell them off before this economic chaos ensued, but they had sunk a lot of money into R&D, only to miss out on the benefits.
Land Rover, on the other hand, seem to have been working within a declining segment. They build big, inefficient cars, to carry big, fat arsed, business people around. Once the preserve of farmers, Land Rovers seem to have evolved into a car for snobs. The "I'm looking down at your little car" mentality suited those who benefited from the boom times well. Now the bust has arrived, Land Rover better hope that their old market still loves them. The now penniless property developers certainly won't be buying them in droves!
As the UK sold off Jaguar and Land Rover years ago, you would have thought any talk of a bailout would be laughed back at; WRONG - our government thinks throwing money at dying car companies is the way forward. They are not even UK companies! Tata bought these companies, with their eyes open. A cynical mind might consider that Tata is just looking for any excuse to withdraw from UK manufacturing and move it to India, where it's cheaper. If they're going to do this anyway, they may as well chance their arm and get some cheap bailout money too!
'It's about the jobs' they say. I'm all for keeping people in jobs, but why not invest in new up and coming companies, rather than these foreign, ageing, behemoths? We have a wealth of talent in the UK, desperately trying to do well on an economic stage. If it wasn't hard enough, in wade the government to give their competitors big wads of cash.
So, it looks like the US 'big three' are going to get their money. At least they are US owned companies and therefore they will be trying to save one of their own! They are being told that if they don't spend it wisely, they'll have to give it back. Eh? Forgive my ignorance, but if the money has been spent and the companies are still failing, then where is the money going to come from to pay the loans back? Is the US government saying that it will have first dibs on liquidation money at the expense of all the other creditors? Is it just a smoke screen to try to reassure people the money isn't a bailout? I'd rather hope it is the latter, even if it's deceitful, as their suppliers will be in big enough trouble as it is. I am grateful for the US government keeping Vauxhall employees in a job, though. Thanks, Unkle Sam!
For those who think that it's hard for all car companies, just look around. All of Germany's car companies seem to be doing fine, despite figures worsening. The big Japanese companies are hunkering down for a long recession, cutting costs and preparing for the worst. I'm sure the new comers, such as Kia, are revelling in the thought that car snobs may soon be considering buying one of their cars. There is a pattern to this; those companies who were struggling before the recession kicked in and now starting to fail. Is it really any surprise? They weren't working in the boom times, so how were they going to function in the bust times?
With each day I get ever more angry and frustrated with the direction of the US and UK governments. The first, is out of my sphere of influence, but the sooner these muppets in control over here realise and admit that we're in the brown stuff (excuse the pun!), the better. We should be planning for the worst. Thinking long term. Investing in the future. The level of short-termism is incredibly disheartening and I believe they are damaging both companies and individuals by living in some deluded, dream world. If this is the worst economic crisis since the second world war, it's high time they stopped treating it like a 'blip' that they can borrow through, came clean and started reforming the country for the future.



















Post your comment
Bob Hume
I'm beginning to wonder just how dumb the current US Administration and UK Goverment think we are.
In other stable door/horse-bolting-related news, I watched with incredulity as Gordon Brown told the oil companies to be careful with their pricing - the consequences of limiting oil production and raising prices would apparently cause something called "Economic Instability".
Am I missing something Gordon?
Paul Green
Paul Green
Firstly, it isn't ours! Unless they're planning on giving Caterham and Triumph a sack of cash, most of our car industry has been sold off to other companies outside of the UK already. This is even more pointless than bailing Rover out was and remember how successful that was?
When will these talking heads realise that this is about a sea change in the way credit is issued. People have been living beyond their means for years and now the financial crisis has put a stop to it. Do they not realise that there will be no return to the previous ways for many years, if not decades? What's the point in bailing out the luxury car makers if there are no luxury car buyers?
These companies need to contract. Unfortunately, jobs will need to go too and sadly this is inevitable. Tata needs to deal with this, not you and I, via taxes. The government needs to concentrate on growing new, relevant industries, not trying to prop on dying ones.
Why don't they use the money to invest in future technologies instead? Sure, they will tell us they're doing that too, but there is a limited amount to go around. It needs to be spent wisely, not on bailing out Tata. If the companies aren't profitable, let Tata wave goodbye to them. I'm sure they will sell to another company at a realistic price. If they don't then the useful assets can be sold off and the useless parts liquidated. This is how a capitalist system is supposed to work. Instead, we have capitalism on the way up and socialism on the way down, which makes it hard for other newer, smaller companies to compete. It really is incredibly infuriating!
Chris
Obviously this rot goes deeper than than the car industry.
The shape of our self serving political governments are fundamentally not geared to cope with drastic changes such as this as they lack any real long-term power. It's just the nature of our modern democracies.
Unfortunately even with government bailouts to the cap-in-hands we will probably still have the massive job cuts as the industry will be forced to remodel itself and most likely rebuild elsewhere as the economic tide shifts naturally.
I see this like a forest fire - the old needs to burn down before new shoots take hold.
Maybe this isn't as bad as it sounds for the UK (at least in relation to the car industry) as it has already been sold off to China and India.
maso
Paul Green
Read the whole article, but here are some highlights:
Post your comment
No matching items could be found. Click here to be the first to advertise!